MEGA Hub

Artificial Intelligence for Workflow Analysis in Colorectal Surgery: A Multicentric, Cross-Procedural Development and Generalization Study

Authors

Do you know Pietro Mascagni?You can claim authorship or link another user.Do you know Julia Alekseenko?You can claim authorship or link another user.Do you know Pooja P Jain?You can claim authorship or link another user.Do you know Marta Goglia?You can claim authorship or link another user.Do you know Andrea Balla?You can claim authorship or link another user.Do you know Ludovica Baldari?You can claim authorship or link another user.Do you know Gianfranco Silecchia?You can claim authorship or link another user.Do you know Claudio Fiorillo?You can claim authorship or link another user.Do you know Vincenzo Tondolo?You can claim authorship or link another user.Do you know Salvador Morales-Conde?You can claim authorship or link another user.Do you know Luigi Boni?You can claim authorship or link another user.Do you know Sergio Alfieri?You can claim authorship or link another user.Do you know Nicolas Padoy?You can claim authorship or link another user.

Abstract

Minimally invasive colorectal surgeries (MIS-CRS) are characterised by significant variability and inconsistent outcomes. ColoWorkflow, a tool for the video-based assessment (VBA) of MIS-CRS workflow, was recently validated. However, manual VBA is time-consuming, limiting implementation. This study presents AI-ColoWorkflow, a deep learning model for automated surgical workflow analysis across MIS-CRS. Operative videos of MIS-CRS were collected from 4 centres and a publicly available dataset. Phases and steps were manually annotated according to ColoWorkflow. A deep learning model combining a fine-tuned DINOv3 vision transformer for per-frame visual feature extraction with a hierarchical multi-stage temporal convolutional network was jointly optimized for phase and step recognition. The model trained on pooled multicentric data, namely AI-ColoWorkflow was compared against centre-specific and procedure-specific models on a held-out test set. The following metrics were used for evaluation: macro F1 score, balanced accuracy, precision, and recall. AI-ColoWorkflow achieved a macro F1 of 73.01% $\pm$ 10.27 (balanced accuracy 73.43%) for phase recognition and 39.82% $\pm$ 7.06 (balanced accuracy 38.65%) for step recognition. The global model outperformed centre- and procedure-specific models in most experiments except procedure-specific step recognition. In the generalization analysis, mean F1 was 48.42% for phase recognition. AI-ColoWorkflow can reliably recognize MIS-CRS phases. A single model trained on pooled, multicentric, multi-procedural data generalises at least as well as and often better than centre- or procedure-specific models for phase recognition in MIS-CRS, while procedure-specific step models retain advantages for certain procedure types, motivating hybrid training strategies for future surgical AI development.

Community

00