MEGA Hub

Tree-of-Experience: Hierarchical Experience Management for Self-Evolving Agents

Authors

Do you know Zihao Deng?You can claim authorship or link another user.Do you know Yining Zhu?You can claim authorship or link another user.Do you know Leiming Wang?You can claim authorship or link another user.Do you know Jingfei Lu?You can claim authorship or link another user.Do you know Junbo Wang?You can claim authorship or link another user.Do you know Chuncheng Ran?You can claim authorship or link another user.Do you know Yu Yang?You can claim authorship or link another user.Do you know Dixuan Yang?You can claim authorship or link another user.Do you know Jikun Shen?You can claim authorship or link another user.

Abstract

Continual self-evolution requires LLM agents to transform environmental interactions into reliable and reusable experience. Existing methods typically refine individual trajectories or abstract shared knowledge from related trajectories, but their experience representations are often disconnected from the underlying reasoning process. This limits feedback attribution, cross-task transfer, and update and retrieval efficiency, particularly in complex reasoning tasks with outcome-level feedback. To overcome this limitation, we propose \textbf{T}ree-\textbf{o}f-\textbf{E}xperience (ToE), a structured experience-management framework that aligns experience organization with the hierarchical reasoning process of LLM agents. Specifically, ToE organizes the experience into a shared tree of analytical perspectives and reasoning paths, whose reliability is calibrated through environmental outcomes to support systematic updating, transfer, and efficient retrieval. The experimental results on \textsc{Game of 24} and \textsc{FinEvolveBench} show that ToE substantially improves both problem-solving performance and efficiency. On \textsc{Game of 24}, ToE achieves a 31.4\% relative improvement in accuracy over the experience-free ToT baseline. On \textsc{FinEvolveBench}, ToE improves tsIC by an average of 41.24\% over the experience-free pipeline across 12 evaluation settings, whereas conventional experience-management methods often underperform experience-free baselines.

Community

00