MEGA Hub

What to Remove, What to Preserve: Dual-Ambiguity Rectification for All-in-One Image Restoration

Authors

Do you know Cencen Liu?You can claim authorship or link another user.Do you know Wen Yin?You can claim authorship or link another user.Do you know Dongyang Zhang?You can claim authorship or link another user.Do you know Dongmin Li?You can claim authorship or link another user.Do you know Shan Zhao?You can claim authorship or link another user.Do you know Bing Su?You can claim authorship or link another user.Do you know Tao He?You can claim authorship or link another user.Do you know Jielei Wang?You can claim authorship or link another user.Do you know Guoming Lu?You can claim authorship or link another user.

Abstract

All-in-one image restoration aims to handle diverse degradations within a unified framework. Existing methods commonly encode heterogeneous degradation conditions in a shared latent space, where degradation-related cues and scene content can remain entangled. We characterize the resulting challenge as dual ambiguity: semantic ambiguity in channel-wise modulation and spatial ambiguity in restoration responses, which can lead to content corruption and residual artifacts. To mitigate this issue, we propose DAR-Net, a Dual-Ambiguity Rectification Network for all-in-one image restoration. DAR-Net first introduces a Degradation Archetype Representation (DAR) module to construct a structured degradation state through simplex-constrained archetype mixture modeling. Based on this state, a Semantic Ambiguity Rectification (SeAR) module generates degradation-aware prompts to improve channel-wise conditioning in the decoder. A Spatial Ambiguity Rectification (SpAR) module further regularizes degradation-aware and complementary features toward orthogonal response subspaces, reducing spatial interference between removal and preservation cues. Extensive experiments on standard all-in-one restoration benchmarks show that DAR-Net achieves the best overall performance under both three-degradation and five-degradation settings, improving the average PSNR over the strongest competitor by 0.14 dB and 0.34 dB, respectively; it additionally shows superior performance on CDD-11 and WeatherBench.

Community

00