MEGA Hub

Kohn-Sham Spectral Embedding on Sparse Graphs at the Nishimori Temperature for Image Classification

Authors

Do you know V. S. Usatyuk?You can claim authorship or link another user.Do you know D. A. Sapozhnikov?You can claim authorship or link another user.Do you know S. I. Egorov?You can claim authorship or link another user.

Abstract

We introduce Kohn--Sham Spectral Embedding (KSSE), a physics-inspired energy-based model replacing dense CNN classifiers with a sparse-graph spectral embedding evaluated at the Nishimori temperature of an associated Random-Bond Ising Model. By mapping pre-trained features onto quasi-cyclic low-density parity-check graphs and constructing a regularized Laplacian acting as a Kohn--Sham Hamiltonian, we solve $D$ independent channel spectral problems in $\mathcal{O}(N\log N + k^2_{\text{mode}} N)$ time via FFT on circulant blocks (leveraging Pontryagin self-duality of $\mathbb{Z}/p\mathbb{Z}$) and low-order Rayleigh refinement. Graph topology is optimized using \emph{star-domain surgery}: rather than destroying information-carrying codewords by removing frustrated cycles, we construct edge shifts creating local convexity around codewords while bounding residual frustration to $ρ(B_γ)\leq 1+δ$. Multi-scale fractal analysis ($D_2$ spectrum) and fractal learning-rate landscape certifies a landscape transition from rough regimes ($D_2>3$) to star-domain basins ($D_2<1$), enabling Rayleigh refinement with $k_{\text{mode}}=5$ modes. We prove six theoretical results: a generalized Ihara--Bass identity linking belief propagation to the Laplacian; trapping-set eigenvalue correspondence; additive channel separability with an explicit exchange-correlation bound; a surgery theorem bounding frustration with attractor width $Ω(1/\sqrt{d_{\min}})$; a quasi-stationarity perturbation bound; and a fixed-point convergence theorem. In a transductive protocol on ImageNet-1000 with frozen EfficientNet-B4 features ($D=1792$), KSSE achieves \textbf{88.93\%} Top-1 accuracy using $\approx 21.24$M parameters, outperforming Swin-L (197M, 86.4--87.3\%) and matching ViT-H/14 (632M, 88.0--89.5\%) under standard inductive setups, while reducing model footprint by $10\times$ and $30\times$, respectively.

Community

00

Publication notes

Author note
42 pages, 10 figures, 5 tables, was presented at the 10th International Conference 'Deep Learning on Computational Physics (DLCP2026)', under review for the Moscow University Physics Bulletin, Physics series