MEGA Hub

Negative controls reveal volume-driven confounding in radiomics and imaging foundation model features

Authors

Do you know Katy L. Scott?You can claim authorship or link another user.Do you know Sejin Kim?You can claim authorship or link another user.Do you know Joshua Siraj?You can claim authorship or link another user.Do you know Caryn Geady?You can claim authorship or link another user.Do you know Matthew Boccalon?You can claim authorship or link another user.Do you know Mattea Welch?You can claim authorship or link another user.Do you know Mogtaba Alim?You can claim authorship or link another user.Do you know Andrew J. Hope?You can claim authorship or link another user.Do you know Benjamin Haibe-Kains?You can claim authorship or link another user.

Abstract

Radiomics and imaging foundation models promise non-invasive biomarkers of tumour biology, yet predictive signatures may reflect tumour volume or acquisition artifacts rather than meaningful image structure. We introduce READII-2-ROQC, an open-source framework that uses volume-preserving negative controls to assess whether radiomic and deep imaging features capture independent spatial signals. READII-2-ROQC generates voxel-perturbed images across tumour, background and whole-image regions using configurable randomization strategies, then compares feature behaviour and model performance between original and control images. Applied to three public cancer imaging cohorts, the framework processed 3,552 tumour volumes and extracted PyRadiomics and foundation-model features from original images and nine matched controls. Reproducing published survival and HPV-status signatures, we show that multiple models retain performance after spatial structure is destroyed, revealing volume-driven or contextual confounding, whereas others show perturbation-sensitive signal. READII-2-ROQC provides a scalable quality-control strategy for developing interpretable, biologically grounded imaging biomarkers and reproducible radiomics workflows.

Community

00

Publication notes

Author note
22 pages (including supplementary), 6 figures, 2 supplementary tables, 5 supplementary figures