MEGA Hub

OmegaUse-OfficeVal: Benchmarking LLM Agents on Long-Horizon Office-Suite Tasks with Economic Grounding

Authors

Do you know Jingbo Zhou?You can claim authorship or link another user.Do you know Yusai Zhao?You can claim authorship or link another user.Do you know Qi Bao?You can claim authorship or link another user.Do you know Jingjia Cao?You can claim authorship or link another user.Do you know Zhenghai Chen?You can claim authorship or link another user.Do you know Chang Gao?You can claim authorship or link another user.Do you know Kaiqi Guo?You can claim authorship or link another user.Do you know Muxin Guo?You can claim authorship or link another user.Do you know Mingxuan Li?You can claim authorship or link another user.Do you know Xinjiang Lu?You can claim authorship or link another user.Do you know Yanru Ma?You can claim authorship or link another user.Do you know Yixiong Xiao?You can claim authorship or link another user.Do you know Zenghui Zhang?You can claim authorship or link another user.Do you know Le Zhang?You can claim authorship or link another user.Do you know Hua Wu?You can claim authorship or link another user.

Abstract

Large language model (LLM) agents are increasingly expected to assist users in completing tasks. However, existing benchmarks provide limited support for evaluating whether agents can carry out office-suite workflows at a reasonable cost. We introduce OmegaUse-OfficeVal, a benchmark for evaluating LLM agents on long-horizon office-suite tasks with task-level economic grounding. The benchmark comprises 100 tasks derived from office-suite requests proposed by practitioners and adapted through a privacy-preserving process. On average, these tasks require 2.32 hours of human labor to complete. An important feature of the benchmark is that each task is paired with two economic signals: human labor time and task price proxy. These signals enable direct comparisons between human costs and LLM inference costs, as well as value-weighted evaluation. To support stable evaluation, we develop code-based verifiers from fine-grained rubrics. We evaluate several frontier LLMs together with a human baseline. Although all evaluated LLMs are substantially cheaper and faster than human workers, they have not yet approached human-level deliverable quality. The code and dataset are fully open-sourced, and more information is available on our project website: https://omegause-officeval.github.io.

Community

00