MEGA Hub

TOUR: A Trajectory-Level Unlearning Benchmark for Offline Reinforcement Learning

Authors

Do you know Chaofan Pan?You can claim authorship or link another user.Do you know Lingfei Ren?You can claim authorship or link another user.Do you know Xiangyu Jiang?You can claim authorship or link another user.Do you know Yanhua Li?You can claim authorship or link another user.Do you know Xuemei Cao?You can claim authorship or link another user.Do you know Xiangkun Wang?You can claim authorship or link another user.Do you know Hao Yu?You can claim authorship or link another user.Do you know Wei Wei?You can claim authorship or link another user.Do you know Xin Yang?You can claim authorship or link another user.

Abstract

Offline Reinforcement Learning (RL) agents are trained on fixed behavioral trajectories, which makes trajectory-level deletion important when selected data must be removed after training. Evaluating such deletion is difficult because a lower membership score can reflect trajectory removal, residual memorization visible to another attack, or policy collapse that destroys useful behavior. We introduce Trajectory-level memOrization and Unlearning in offline RL (TOUR), a benchmark that combines trajectory-level partitioning, matched non-member controls, retraining references, retained-performance anchors, and multi-attack privacy auditing. Across D4RL locomotion experiments and an exploratory AntMaze extension, TOUR shows that common deletion baselines have environment-dependent privacy-utility behavior. Retraining and fine-tuning often provide stronger retained-utility references than uniform GA+Refit, while TrajDeleter remains a useful comparator but is not uniformly stronger under the same audit. Reference-model, threshold, deviation, equivalence, action-error, representation-based, and query-limited attacks further show that a single likelihood-based membership score can overstate deletion quality. In the evaluated settings, conclusions about offline RL unlearning are therefore not stable under single-score auditing. They depend on matched non-member construction, retraining-relative calibration, attack family, retained utility, and explicit scope for diagnostic architecture or component-level evidence.

Community

00