MEGA Hub

Text Template Tokens Are Implicit Semantic Registers in Diffusion Transformers

Authors

Do you know Maohua Li?You can claim authorship or link another user.Do you know Qirui Li?You can claim authorship or link another user.Do you know Yanke Zhou?You can claim authorship or link another user.Do you know Yiduo Li?You can claim authorship or link another user.Do you know Zhaosheng Chi?You can claim authorship or link another user.Do you know Chao Xu?You can claim authorship or link another user.Do you know Cuifeng Shen?You can claim authorship or link another user.Do you know Yixuan Xu?You can claim authorship or link another user.Do you know Hanlin Tang?You can claim authorship or link another user.Do you know Kan Liu?You can claim authorship or link another user.Do you know Tao Lan?You can claim authorship or link another user.Do you know Lin Qu?You can claim authorship or link another user.Do you know Shao-Qun Zhang?You can claim authorship or link another user.

Abstract

Text-to-image diffusion transformers (DiTs) jointly process text and image tokens, yet their internal computation during denoising remains poorly understood. We introduce a causal interpretability framework for modern large-scale DiTs that combines attention decomposition with targeted interventions across token spans, heads, and layers. Using it to separate prompt-content tokens from structural template tokens, we find that the structural tokens carry little prompt-specific information at the encoder output. Yet surprisingly, they emerge as dominant image-to-text attention sinks and causally maintain object identity inside the DiT, acting as implicit semantic registers. We show that they acquire this identity indirectly, with prompt semantics first injected into the image latents and then read back into the template tokens rather than transferred directly from the prompt tokens. Inspired by the above findings, we design a training-free pruning rule for DiTs. Heads that attend most strongly to prompt tokens are dispensable, and pruning them removes $20\%$ of attention FLOPs with only a $1.4$-point drop on GenEval. We further reveal how generative computation in DiTs is organized across heads and depth, separating semantic routing from visual synthesis and progressing from identity formation to propagation and refinement. Our work not only reveals that the tokens encoding semantics at input need not be those that maintain it during generation, but also provides a causal view of internal mechanisms in DiTs.

Community

00